Install this theme
HOW TO SHAKESPEARE

professorfangirl:

motherfuckingshakespeare:

motherfuckingshakespeare:

HERE’S THE LATEST SERIES OF THINGS. THIS IS YOUR SHAKESPEARE STARTER KIT. IF YOU PARSE THROUGH THESE A LITTLE BIT YOU’LL BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND A LOT BETTER OR AT LEAST BULLSHIT YOUR WAY THROUGH YOUR CLASS A LOT MORE CONVINCINGLY.

IF YOU WANT MORE INFO OR NEED CLARIFICATION LEMME KNOW. ALSO TELL ME IF YOU WANT A CLEAN VERSION OF A POST OR GRAPHIC TO USE AS AN EDUCATIONAL TYPE THING. YOU CAN FIND ALL OF THESE POSTS TAGGED ‘GENERAL’ &/OR ‘HOW TO’ 

UPDATED TO INCLUDE SOME NICE NEW STUFF LIKE USING PROPER CONJUGATION WITH THOU AND WHEN PROSE AND VERSE HAPPEN!

prooooobably gonna have to rec this to my class. With caveats, but still—you say “fuck” almost as often as I do in class.

hoopyfez:

timelordinadevilstrap:

Fun fact: tennant forgot his line in this scene and said this instead

WHAT

thief-in-the-dark:

internleland:

wtnvwinchesters:

I’ve come to the conclusion that Sam and Dean would take one look at Night Vale and burn it to the ground, civilians be damned.

i’ve come to the conclusion sam and dean would drive into night vale and spontaneously combust from being exposed to sexual and racial diversity and women who don’t die within a week

image

miasmastream:

justaguywitharrows:

naturallybent:

qbits:

(via Della Wolf is B.C.’s 1st child with 3 parents on birth certificate - British Columbia - CBC News)
"A Vancouver baby has just become the first child in British Columbia with three parents listed on a birth certificate.
Three-month-old Della Wolf Kangro Wiley Richards is the daughter of lesbian parents and their male friend.
"It feels really just natural and easy, like any other family," said biological father Shawn Kangro. "It doesn’t feel like anything is strange about it."
B.C.’s new Family Law Act, which came into effect last year, allows for three or even more parents.
Della’s family is the first to go through the process, and they finalized the birth certificate registration last week.
B.C., which is celebrating Family Day on Monday, is the first province in Canada with legislation to allow three parents on a birth certificate, although it’s been achieved elsewhere through litigation.”

the better (not harper) side of canada.

THIS IS REALLY COOL AND IMPORTANT AND KIND OF FUCKING REVOLUTIONARY

well boys i guess we’re going to canada

miasmastream:

justaguywitharrows:

naturallybent:

qbits:

(via Della Wolf is B.C.’s 1st child with 3 parents on birth certificate - British Columbia - CBC News)

"A Vancouver baby has just become the first child in British Columbia with three parents listed on a birth certificate.

Three-month-old Della Wolf Kangro Wiley Richards is the daughter of lesbian parents and their male friend.

"It feels really just natural and easy, like any other family," said biological father Shawn Kangro. "It doesn’t feel like anything is strange about it."

B.C.’s new Family Law Act, which came into effect last year, allows for three or even more parents.

Della’s family is the first to go through the process, and they finalized the birth certificate registration last week.

B.C., which is celebrating Family Day on Monday, is the first province in Canada with legislation to allow three parents on a birth certificate, although it’s been achieved elsewhere through litigation.”

the better (not harper) side of canada.

THIS IS REALLY COOL AND IMPORTANT AND KIND OF FUCKING REVOLUTIONARY

well boys i guess we’re going to canada

dlgr:

liralicia:

iamchubbybunny:

slimed:

madmothmiko:

Sailor Moon Illustrations by asieybarbie

YES

YES YES, 1000 TIMES YES

I’ve reblogged most of these individually before, she’s an amazing artist. Do yourselves a favor and check her entire art gallery.

THESE ARE AMAAAZIIIINNNGGGGGGG

cataradical:

cabell:

drtanner:

al10nsy:

mypocketshurt90:

apersnicketylemon:

personhoodusa:

Tragedy: Marlise Munoz’s baby is judicially murdered by forced abortion. Read our opinion here: http://bit.ly/1jBJQYT http://ift.tt/1fr2DAZ

The fetus was deemed non-viable, the fetus was deprived of oxygen for too long when Marlise Munoz was without a heart beat. Her living will stated that she did not wish to be on life support if she were brain dead under any circumstances which does include pregnancy. Her family had to go to court for the right to remover her from life support because the state reduced her to an incubator for a fetus that COULD NEVER SURVIVE OUTSIDE HER UTERUS.
They were both dead long before she was taken off life support, how fucking DARE you call that a ‘forced abortion’. It was anything but, and considering the fetus had 0 chance of surviving once born you have no reason to be upset anyways.

This is the shittiest propaganda I’ve seen in a long, long time.  You have twisted this tragedy so hard I could open a bottle of wine with it.

Seriously… That fetus was long gone. If you think for a second that this was the wrong decision, you have issues.


What the fuck is wrong with your goddamned country.

The viability of the fetus is entirely beside the point.
Marlise Muñoz, like her husband, was a licensed paramedic.  She had an advance directive that specifically rejected life support in the event of brain death.  She was a capable adult who knew very well that this would mean termination of any fetus that was not yet independently viable.
Her husband supported her wishes, also understood their implication for a non-independently viable fetus, and fought like hell to force the state to follow her advance directive despite bullshit state laws designed to strip pregnant people of the standard bodily autonomy granted to corpses.
This was a state-imposed forced pregnancy, in addition to forced life support, right up until Erick Muñoz’s lawyers were able to enforce her advance directive sadly only by appealing to the irrelevant status of the fetus.

i went to the comments section on the first article and got this

Kay @  AWomannotanincubator 






Um, actually, a woman’s body is designed to grow people, so… what’s wrong with being an incubator?

incredible

cataradical:

cabell:

drtanner:

al10nsy:

mypocketshurt90:

apersnicketylemon:

personhoodusa:

Tragedy: Marlise Munoz’s baby is judicially murdered by forced abortion. Read our opinion here: http://bit.ly/1jBJQYT http://ift.tt/1fr2DAZ

The fetus was deemed non-viable, the fetus was deprived of oxygen for too long when Marlise Munoz was without a heart beat. Her living will stated that she did not wish to be on life support if she were brain dead under any circumstances which does include pregnancy. Her family had to go to court for the right to remover her from life support because the state reduced her to an incubator for a fetus that COULD NEVER SURVIVE OUTSIDE HER UTERUS.

They were both dead long before she was taken off life support, how fucking DARE you call that a ‘forced abortion’. It was anything but, and considering the fetus had 0 chance of surviving once born you have no reason to be upset anyways.

This is the shittiest propaganda I’ve seen in a long, long time.  You have twisted this tragedy so hard I could open a bottle of wine with it.

Seriously… That fetus was long gone. If you think for a second that this was the wrong decision, you have issues.

image

What the fuck is wrong with your goddamned country.

The viability of the fetus is entirely beside the point.

Marlise Muñoz, like her husband, was a licensed paramedic.  She had an advance directive that specifically rejected life support in the event of brain death.  She was a capable adult who knew very well that this would mean termination of any fetus that was not yet independently viable.

Her husband supported her wishes, also understood their implication for a non-independently viable fetus, and fought like hell to force the state to follow her advance directive despite bullshit state laws designed to strip pregnant people of the standard bodily autonomy granted to corpses.

This was a state-imposed forced pregnancy, in addition to forced life support, right up until Erick Muñoz’s lawyers were able to enforce her advance directive sadly only by appealing to the irrelevant status of the fetus.

i went to the comments section on the first article and got this

Um, actually, a woman’s body is designed to grow people, so… what’s wrong with being an incubator?

incredible

niczka:

image

And Dany stops by to help out, so they ask her to be a Queen too. 

AND THE WESTEROS IS AT PEACE FOREVER AND FULL OF AWESOMENESS AND DRAGONS. 

The end. 

it got better

blindsprings:

secondlina:

Here is “Knot”, a short comic I drew to sell at Mocca and TCAF this year. The printed version is going to be SO PRETTY. I’m in love with the cover (which I will post later).

I just wanted to do something fairy-tale-like that talked about doubts and frustrations and how to deal with them. I’m really happy with how colorful and adorable the story turned out to be. 

If you enjoyed “Knot”, please consider reblogging it and/or checking out my ongoing webcomic Namesake! HUGS TO ALL OF YOU!

Isa’s been showing me wips of this for awhile, look how pretty this is finished, ahhh!!

cinematicnomad:

the stories coming out of the media hotels at the sochi olympics are just 100% ridiculous

Anonymous
asks:
Hi Froggy! As usual, the internet does not give a very good example of a social movement. The men's rights movement is actually mostly concerned with addressing the lack of justice for male victims of rape & domestic violence, more prominent mental illness & suicide in men, family court bias & selective military service, as well as social attitudes towards male disposability and incompetence. Not shorts in the workplace. And it certainly isn't about perpetuating misogyny. Have a good one!

thefrogman:

I’ve been to the forums. I’ve interacted with the people. I’ve tried to give the men’s rights movement a chance. Unfortunately the people involved are much more concerned about derailing and dismantling feminism than actually solving any of those issues. As if they can’t make any progress until feminism is destroyed. 

"Family court is unfair and biased towards women. Those darn feminists!" Except that the majority of lawmakers are old white men. From federal to state legislature… they created all the rules, regulations, and laws that govern the courts. They think they are doing men a favor. "Raising children is a woman’s job. Just send a check every month and let them take care of the ankle biters." And the whole family court system is pretty dysfunctional. It isn’t a utopia for mothers that grants their every wish. Mothers and fathers both have the same enemy. They have to influence the same lawmakers to improve the system. 

Male rape victims don’t get taken seriously. Again, most detectives are men. Most of the police leadership are men. The lawmakers are mostly men. So let’s blame feminism for not getting justice.

You really don’t think women care about male victims of abuse? Many feminists are mothers of sons. Sons who they love to no end. Of course they care. Of course they want the justice system to care about their sons. Which is why feminists want to dismantle the system that says that men are strong and women are weak. The system that says men cannot really be raped. 

The problem lies in how MRAs react to feminism. They see people talking about women’s issues and their reaction is not one of empathy. It is always, “What about us? Bad stuff happens to us too.” Just like that fellow who saw women trying to talk about their hardships in a work environment. He pipes in and complains about not being able to wear shorts. And worse, he equates his issue with theirs even though they aren’t even close in magnitude. Yes, it was a ridiculous example, but it perfectly demonstrated this common reaction men seem to have. When someone is talking about their problems, the proper response is not to reply with a list of your problems. No one is saying that your problems don’t matter, just that this isn’t the proper time to talk about them. 

If the MRAs continue to derail every conversation by making it about them, they are not going to be taken seriously. There is plenty of space to talk about men’s issues. They don’t need to invade the space of feminism to be heard. And if they keep thinking women are the enemy, even though women are actually trying to make progress with some of the very issues you mentioned, they aren’t going to have much luck actually solving anything they care about.

queerofsheba:

russia: no homo

the rest of the world: image

madmaudlingoes:

bropakpro:

touch-my-cuboner:

zecretary:

zecretary:

the stereotype that women talk more than men is infinitely amusing to me because men are literally incapable of shutting the fuck up

i hope this post gets popular enough that i hurt a man’s feelings

It’s not a stereotype it’s a proven fact you femanazi piece of shit.

lmao there it is 

You wanna talk proven facts? This shit’s been done, son: researcher Dale Spender in Australia used audio and video tape to independently evaluate who talked the most in mixed-gender university classroom discussions. Regardless of the gender ratio of the students, whether the instructor was deliberately trying to encourage female participation or not, men always talked more—whether the metric was minutes of talking or number of words spoken. 

Moreover, men literally have no clue how much they talk. When Spender asked students to evaluate their perception of who talked more in a given discussion, women were pretty accurate; but men perceived the discussion as being “equal” when women talked only 15% of the time, and the discussion as being dominated by women if they talked only 30% of the time.

Spender’s conclusion, if I may parahprase: you only think we talk too much because you’d rather we were silent.

Don’t fuck with me, asshole, I’m a scientist.

Edit: I can’t believe I got her name wrong multiple times. The researcher in question is Dale Spender and the original publication of this research was called Man Made Language (1980).

kirkwa:

And This Is Why You Shouldn’t Get Sick In America

Many believe that the US healthcare system is the best in the world. Not so according to the World Health Organization’s ranking of the world’s health systems. The US doesn’t even rank in the top 25. It ranks 37th and is the most expensive in the world. I would argue that even if we had the best healthcare system in the world, what good is it, if no one can afford to access it.

Most companies are buying 60/40-policys for their employees these days, but even if you are lucky enough to have good insurance with 80/20-policy coverage, that 20 percent your responsible for can drive you right into bankruptcy as easily as the 60-40 policy given the cost of healthcare.

Insurance cost have been going up dramatically in the last two decades, long before the new Affordable Healthcare Act has taken affect, in some cases as much as 35% per year.

But have you noticed the latest trick the insurance companies have roll out?

Yes, Higher Deductible… most averaging $5,000 per year, per person, but I have seen some as high as $10,000 per year. For those of you that are wondering, this tactic is specifically designed too stop you from using your insurance. It reduces the insurance companies out of pocket liability by shift costs onto consumers, especially those dealing with chronic illness such as diabetes and arthritis. Consequently, because consumers can’t afford the deductible they will avoid necessary care to save money.

Although insurance companies are a problem, the real crocks is the healthcare system it self. A corrupt and bloated system desperately in need of reform!

spellthief:

If I’m able to, then perhaps I’ll be closer to portraying a true expression of love.

          -Hayao Miyazaki (x)